Category Archives: WCAB

New WCAB En Banc Guidance on Replacing Unavailable QMEs

May 19, 2025 Introduction In a significant en banc decision, Vazquez v. Renteria (Zenith Insurance Co.) (May 19, 2025) ADJ11017003 (Salinas District Office), the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) clarified when a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) in a represented case may be replaced due to unavailability. The decision emphasizes that while Administrative Director (AD) rules […]

Season’s (Dis)Abled Greetings: A Detailed Guide to TTD and PD for California’s Seasonal Workers

Seasonal workers are indispensable to many of California’s industries—particularly agriculture, tourism, and hospitality. When these workers are injured on the job, determining how to calculate Temporary Total Disability (TTD) and Permanent Disability (PD) benefits can be challenging, especially if there is an “off-season” when the worker does not perform services for the employer. Below is […]

Cumulative Trauma Conundrums: How Lira Sheds Light on Single vs. Multiple CT Injuries

Overview In the recent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) panel decision, Lira v. Cottage Health System, the Board clarified how to analyze cumulative trauma (“CT”) claims when an applicant alleges separate injury periods at different employers but maintains similar job duties with no real break in treatment or recovery. Below is a concise guide for […]

Evans v. San Mateo County Transit District: Practical Takeaways on Apportionment and Overpayment Credits for Claims Adjusters

Introduction A recent panel decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) — Evans v. San Mateo County Transit District (2025 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 27) — offers critical insights into two hot-button issues for claims adjusters: (1) establishing valid apportionment of permanent disability and (2) seeking a credit against overpaid temporary disability (TD) […]

Straightening Out Spinal Impairment: DRE vs. ROM

When assigning permanent impairment for a spinal injury under the AMA Guides, 5th Edition, two primary pathways emerge: the Diagnosis-Related Estimates (DRE) method and the Range of Motion (ROM) method. The stakes are high for claims adjusters, as choosing the proper approach—and scrutinizing the results—can drastically impact claim reserves and settlement strategies. Below is a […]

Double the Injury, Double the 4850? The WCAB Takes a Second Look at Overlapping Police Disability Benefits

Introduction When a California law enforcement officer sustains two separate workplace injuries—especially if those injuries overlap in time—how should Labor Code § 4850 “leave of absence” benefits be applied? That is the question at the heart of Agaiby v. City of Culver City (2024 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 382), a recent Workers’ Compensation Appeals […]

Add or Combine? How Robasciotti v. Maxim Healthcare Redefines the “Kite” Analysis for Multiple Disabilities

Introduction A recent panel decision out of the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board—Robasciotti v. Maxim Healthcare (2024 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 365)—provides important lessons on how multiple impairments may be combined or “added” when rating an injured worker’s permanent disability. In particular, it underscores the continued importance of the “Kite doctrine,” which allows for […]

WCAB Panel Decision Round-Up: Top Issues for Claims Adjusters

1. Apportionment Pitfalls and Documentation Key TrendMany recent WCAB decisions have emphasized the need for clear, well-supported medical opinions on apportionment. Panels repeatedly admonished parties where physicians simply assigned percentages with inadequate rationales or failed to distinguish non-industrial from industrial factors. Adjusters often faced delays and higher litigation costs when an inadequate physician report triggered […]

Timely Denials and Thorough Investigations: A Key Takeaway from Bracy v. State of California 2024 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 355 (WCAB Panel Decision, October 15, 2024)

In a recent panel decision, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) offered a cautionary tale for claims administrators and insurance carriers on how a seemingly straightforward denial can inadvertently fail to trigger the one-year statute of limitations (SOL). Although Bracy v. State of California is not binding precedent, it provides valuable insights into best practices […]

California Supreme Court Clarifies That Industrial Disability Leave (IDL) Does Not Count as “Compensation” for Serious & Willful Misconduct Penalties

In a significant decision for California public employers and claims professionals, the California Supreme Court in Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Ayala) has clarified that Industrial Disability Leave (IDL) benefits paid under the Government Code do not qualify as “compensation” under the Workers’ Compensation Act. This means that when an […]